<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware the Sharepoint Data Catalogue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/</link>
	<description>My online Memory about Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Business Intelligence and all things technical</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SharePoint 2010 wish list &#171; Charlie Maitland&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-8708</link>
		<dc:creator>SharePoint 2010 wish list &#171; Charlie Maitland&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-8708</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#160;Here&#160;and Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#160;Here&#160;and Here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Maitland</title>
		<link>http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1734</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Maitland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1734</guid>
		<description>Hi
I have added a clarifying post on the Microsoft Definition of Multiplexing which my reading shows rules out both Peter&#039;s and geoff&#039;s ideas.
http://charliem.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/multiplexing-and-licenses/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I have added a clarifying post on the Microsoft Definition of Multiplexing which my reading shows rules out both Peter&#8217;s and geoff&#8217;s ideas.<br />
<a href="http://charliem.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/multiplexing-and-licenses/" rel="nofollow">http://charliem.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/multiplexing-and-licenses/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>Charlie, you are spot on. This is a huge problem for us.  We clearly see the potential of BDC&#039;s but if Microsoft insist on full licensing then it will go no where.
Does the same apply if we batch copy the relevant CRM to a SQL store and then rpesent that in sharepoint?  A cludge I know but does it solve the license problem?
A read only license is the answer. MS gets more money and we partners are free to generate affordable &quot;People Ready&quot; solutions. 

Geoff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, you are spot on. This is a huge problem for us.  We clearly see the potential of BDC&#8217;s but if Microsoft insist on full licensing then it will go no where.<br />
Does the same apply if we batch copy the relevant CRM to a SQL store and then rpesent that in sharepoint?  A cludge I know but does it solve the license problem?<br />
A read only license is the answer. MS gets more money and we partners are free to generate affordable &#8220;People Ready&#8221; solutions. </p>
<p>Geoff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ward</title>
		<link>http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>Why not use a 3rd party reporting product like insight, by Scribe, to pull the info out and put it into Sharepoint.

This software is about $1000.  

So it&#039;ll take 2 days to custom and you are done.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not use a 3rd party reporting product like insight, by Scribe, to pull the info out and put it into Sharepoint.</p>
<p>This software is about $1000.  </p>
<p>So it&#8217;ll take 2 days to custom and you are done.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Maitland&#8217;s Blog Set your data free &#171;</title>
		<link>http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Maitland&#8217;s Blog Set your data free &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>[...] Yes they even use the example of CRM despite the fact that the Microsoft licensing cripples ANY realistic prospect of this admirable goal being achieved. I have ranted about this before. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes they even use the example of CRM despite the fact that the Microsoft licensing cripples ANY realistic prospect of this admirable goal being achieved. I have ranted about this before. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanwal</title>
		<link>http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>Charlie

Very good post on the licenses issues.   Its definitely a problem for the mid size company.


You are now part of the Sharepoint BUZZ


Visit http://www.sharepointbuzz.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie</p>
<p>Very good post on the licenses issues.   Its definitely a problem for the mid size company.</p>
<p>You are now part of the Sharepoint BUZZ</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://www.sharepointbuzz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sharepointbuzz.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ykud</title>
		<link>http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>ykud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charliem.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/beware-the-sharepoint-data-catalogue/#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>I guess licensing is the very point  where most mistakes are made. That full-license idea will change to full access\view-only bundles for sure, after some real selling. 
Yet it&#039;s very bad time, between sane licensing policy and current &quot;give-us-money&quot; problems. I&#039;d suggest to talk with vendor on every prospect\pre-sale to form normal prices.  Yet you cannot attract vendor attention on every 50k, from another point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess licensing is the very point  where most mistakes are made. That full-license idea will change to full access\view-only bundles for sure, after some real selling.<br />
Yet it&#8217;s very bad time, between sane licensing policy and current &#8220;give-us-money&#8221; problems. I&#8217;d suggest to talk with vendor on every prospect\pre-sale to form normal prices.  Yet you cannot attract vendor attention on every 50k, from another point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
